sputnik

22 octobre 2009

As for Anita Dunn

As for Anita Dunn... what's that thing she's doing with her tongue? Did she eat a lot of peanut butter before going up to do her speech? Man, that is unattractive. But as for what she said:

"And Mao Tse Tung said, 'You know, you fight your war, and I'll fight mine.' And think about that for a second. You don't have to accept the definition of how to do things, and you don't have to follow other people's choices and paths, OK?"

Okay.Cuisine, Dague, Enfants, Fimo, Fleau, Fleche, Gambison, Heaume, Humour

"It is about your choices and your path. You fight your own war. You lay out your own path. You figure out what's right for you. You don't let external definitions define how good you are internally. You fight your war. You let them fight theirs. Everybody has their own path."

And if killing millions of people is right for you, don't let anyone stop you. You have your own path...

I can think of some non-nefarious reasons for saying that. Dunn is a bit of an idiot, and though she is the White House communications director, she's not too good at communicating. She doesn't seem to know that things you say can be looked at in more ways than the one you intend. I wonder how long she'll be kept around. Is there a bus coming along that path of hers?

Posté par bertreuyt à 11:31 - Commentaires [1] - Rétroliens [0]
Tags : , , , , , , , ,

Chief Justice John Roberts

Broderie, Camail, Casque, Chocolat, Corne, Cotte-de-maille, Couture, Crochet
Chief Justice John Roberts, talking tough about drunk driving, as he dissents from a denial of certiorari, in a case where the state court said it violates the Fourth Amendment to pull over a driver based solely on an anonymous tip. (The police responding to the call did not see the driver do anything wrong.)

Some state courts have said this is not a search-and-seizure violation and some have said it is. How important do you think it is that this interpretation of federal constitutional law now varies from state to state? Should the U.S. Supreme Court become involved when a state has given what might be an overly generous meaning to a constitutional right? Or can we tolerate this diversity of interpretation?

Posté par bertreuyt à 11:30 - Commentaires [0] - Rétroliens [0]
Tags : , , , , , , ,

What I intended to say

Animaux, Anniversaire, Arbalete, Arc, Automne, Baudrier, Bd, Blabla, Blog, Bouclier
What I intended to say, though, before being sidetracked by that great idea, I know what they mean by "dodgy photoshop" but dodgy is an inapt adjective when talking about Photoshop because within Photoshop dodge is a tool that reduces exposure to an applied area, burn is its opposite. Ha ha ha.

This could be confusing. Burn for a dodgy Photoshop.

Posté par bertreuyt à 11:28 - Commentaires [0] - Rétroliens [0]
Tags : , , , , , , , , ,